Curious about Actual Dell EMC PowerFlex Design (D-PWF-DS-23) Exam Questions?
Here are sample Dell EMC Dell PowerFlex Design 2023 (D-PWF-DS-23) Exam questions from real exam. You can get more Dell EMC PowerFlex Design (D-PWF-DS-23) Exam premium practice questions at TestInsights.
A customer application generates 2 GB/s writes The outage is under two hours. What capacity must be allowed for the journal?
Correct : B
To calculate the required journal capacity, we need to consider the maximum cumulative writes that might occur during an outage. The calculation is based on the application's write bandwidth and the duration of the supported outage. For an application generating 2 GB/s of writes, using a 2-hour outage (which is 7200 seconds), the journal capacity reservation needed is:
JournalCapacity=WriteBandwidthOutageDuration
JournalCapacity=2GB/s7200s=14400GB
However, since the question specifies that the outage is under two hours, we use the minimum outage allowance of 1 hour for the calculation, which is 3600 seconds. Therefore, the correct calculation is:
JournalCapacity=2GB/s3600s=7200GB
But considering the recommendation to use three hours in the calculations for safety, the needed capacity would be approximately 10.547 TB, which is roughly 10.800 GB12. Hence, the verified answer is 10.800 GB.
Start a Discussions
An architect das configured a PowerFlex solution to use a tine granularity storage pool based on a customer's Initial request After validating the design against a LiveOptlcs output they modified the granularity of the configuration to medium What did the architect accomplish with this change'
Correct : A
By changing the granularity of the PowerFlex storage pool from fine to medium, the architect improved the performance of the system. Medium Granularity (MG) storage pools are recommended for environments where I/O performance and low latency are critical, such as Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) deployments1.
Here's a detailed explanation of the change:
Fine Granularity (FG): FG storage pools are designed for space efficiency and enable features like inline compression, which can reduce the size of volume data depending on its compressibility. However, this can come at the cost of performance due to the overhead of compression and the smaller space allocation block size2.
Medium Granularity (MG): MG storage pools, on the other hand, provide supreme I/O performance with the least latency to virtual machines and applications. They use a larger space allocation block size of 1 MB, which is more efficient for I/O operations compared to the 4 KB block size used in FG storage pools1.
Performance Improvement: By switching to an MG storage pool, the architect ensured that the storage volumes provide better I/O performance and lower latency, which is essential for applications that require fast and responsive storage access1.
This change aligns with the best practices for PowerFlex storage provisioning, where the selection of granularity is based on the specific performance and space efficiency needs of the customer's workload1.
Start a Discussions
What maximum raw capacity can a user expect in a 1U Node while configuring a PowerFlex with an MG pool?
Correct : A
The maximum raw capacity that can be expected in a 1U Node while configuring a PowerFlex system with an MG (Multi-Granularity) pool is 38.4 TB. This is based on the typical maximum raw storage capacity available for a 1U node configuration, which is designed to fit within the physical constraints of a 1U rack space while providing a balance of capacity and performance1.
The MG pool in PowerFlex is designed to optimize storage efficiency and performance, and the capacity of a 1U node would be aligned with the specifications that ensure the system's reliability and scalability. The other options listed provide capacities that are generally too high for a single 1U node within the PowerFlex architecture1.
Therefore, the correct answer is A. 38.4 TB, as it represents the realistic maximum raw capacity for a 1U Node in a PowerFlex system with an MG pool.
Start a Discussions
An administrator wants to migrate a volume from one storage pool to another storage pool What two volume migrations are possible ?(Select 2)
Correct : B, D
Volume migration in PowerFlex allows for the movement of volumes between storage pools, which can be necessary for various operational reasons such as performance tuning, capacity expansion, or infrastructure upgrades. The possible migrations are:
Option B: Migrating from an MG (Medium Granularity) storage pool volume that is zero padded and thick provisioned to an FG (Fine Granularity) storage pool volume that is also zero padded and thin provisioned. This migration is possible and allows for a change in the provisioning and granularity of the volume, which can be beneficial for optimizing storage efficiency and performance1.
Option D: Migrating from an MG storage pool volume that is non-zero padded and thin provisioned to another MG storage pool volume that is zero padded and thin provisioned. This migration is within the same granularity type (MG) and involves changing the padding of the volume. It is a viable option when adjusting the volume configuration for specific storage optimization needs1.
These migrations are supported by PowerFlex's flexible architecture, which allows for non-disruptive volume movements between storage pools. The process involves using PowerFlex's management tools to initiate and monitor the migration, ensuring data integrity and system stability throughout the operation1.
The references for these migrations come from PowerFlex documentation and best practices, which detail the procedures and capabilities of the system regarding volume management and migration1. It is important to follow the recommended guidelines to ensure successful migrations that align with the system's design and operational principles.
Start a Discussions
An administrator is migrating a vTree for a snapshot to a different storage pool What is a restriction few the migration''
Correct : D
When migrating a vTree for a snapshot to a different storage pool in PowerFlex, one of the restrictions is that the migration cannot occur between storage pools with different data layouts if multiple volumes are involved in the vTree. This is because the data layout is fundamental to how data is organized and managed within the storage pool, and migrating multiple volumes with different data layouts could lead to inconsistencies and potential data integrity issues.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Data Layout Compatibility: For a successful migration, the source and target storage pools should have compatible data layouts. Migrating vTrees that span multiple volumes between storage pools with different data layouts is restricted because it could disrupt the organization and accessibility of the data1.
Single Volume Migration: While it is possible to migrate a single volume vTree between storage pools with different data layouts, doing so with multiple volumes in the vTree is not supported due to the complexity and risk involved1.
This restriction ensures that the integrity of the data is maintained during the migration process and that the storage system continues to operate reliably. It is important to consult the PowerFlex documentation, such as the ''Configure and Customize Dell PowerFlex'' guide, for detailed information on supported migration scenarios and restrictions1.
Start a Discussions
Total 40 questions